News

To prevail in the war unleashed by the russian federation against Ukraine, military production must be seen as a shared national mission rather than an opportunity to profit from defence technologies. This was stated by Colonel Mykyta “Raz-Dva” Nadtochii, Deputy Commander of the 1st Azov Corps (National Guard of Ukraine), at the 18th annual Kyiv Security Forum “Darkness or Dawn: Is Light Ahead?”“Speaking about the interaction between the military and various developers—both Ukrainian companies and those from partner countries — I would like to highlight one crucial point. Regarding our manufacturers – as long as we treat this effort merely as a business, we will continue to lose,” Nadtochii stated.He stressed that manufacturers must respond to military feedback with maximum speed, continuously refining and optimising their products so they can be rapidly used to destroy the enemy.Thus, when the entire nation, the whole of Ukraine, understands that this is not a time for business or profit — when everyone realises that our absolute priority is to overcome the challenge posed by our adversary — will we succeed,” the serviceman noted.However, he acknowledged that many manufacturers have already adopted a model of cooperation with the military in which “profit is not the primary driver, but rather the effectiveness of destroying the enemy.”“Once we achieve true symbiosis between the military and manufacturers, we will see tangible results,” Nadtochii said. He also advised foreign partners not only to adopt Ukraine’s military experience, but to learn from the mistakes made in the civilian sector.“First as a brigade, and now as a corps, we have encountered those who were merely looking to profiteer. They tried to sell us quite expensive products, presenting them as high-end and highly effective. However, after our own tests, we found that these solutions could be produced more cheaply and with far greater efficiency,” the serviceman stated.Consequently, the military established its own R&amp;D unit, which continually tests drones supplied by various manufacturers.Kyiv Security Forum (KSF) is an annual international event launched in 2007 on the initiative of Arseniy Yatsenyuk Open Ukraine Foundation. This year’s Forum is taking place on 23-24 April.

To prevail in the war unleashed by the russian federation against Ukraine, military production must be seen as a shared national mission rather than an opportunity to profit from defence technologies. This was stated by Colonel Mykyta “Raz-Dva” Nadtochii, Deputy Commander of the 1st Azov Corps (National Guard of Ukraine), at the 18th annual Kyiv Security Forum “Darkness or Dawn: Is Light Ahead?”

“As long as military production is viewed merely as a business, we will continue to lose” –  Deputy Commander of the 1st Azov Corps

Transatlantic cooperation remains a cornerstone of European security, and the “America First” concept does not imply that the US is turning its back on its allies. This was stated by Tomas Godliauskas, Lithuania’s Vice Minister of National Defence, at the 18th annual Kyiv Security Forum “Darkness or Dawn: Is Light Ahead?”According to him, the world is facing a new level of threats as authoritarian states increasingly coordinate their actions. “We see how Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea are becoming more aligned and supporting each other, which poses a serious challenge to global security,” he said.In this context, Godliauskas emphasised that the “America First” approach should be understood not as isolationism, but as a redistribution of responsibility among allies. “This does not mean that America will stand alone. It is about allies taking on a greater share of the responsibility,” the Vice Minister believes.He cited Lithuania as an example, highlighting the country’s significant increase in defence spending. “We are spending over 5% of GDP on defence, and we understand that without Europe, the US would not be able to effectively project its power or ensure nuclear deterrence,” he stressed.According to the Lithuanian official, there are currently no signs of a reduction in the American military presence in the region. “Since 2019, US units have been permanently stationed in Lithuania. Training exercises are ongoing, including those involving HIMARS systems, and this cooperation continues to strengthen,” Godliauskas said.“Open Ukraine” is an international foundation established in 2007 on the initiative of Arseniy Yatsenyuk to strengthen Ukraine’s international standing. Each year, it organises the Kyiv Security Forum – Ukraine’s leading international platform for discussing war and peace – as well as the Youth Kyiv Security Forum, aimed at fostering a new generation of Ukrainian leaders.

“America First” does not mean isolation” – Godliauskas, Lithuanian Vice Minister of National Defence 

Current debates in the United States regarding NATO and aid for Ukraine reflect deeper shifts in approaches to global security. This was stated by Steven Pifer, an affiliate at the Center for International Security and Cooperation within the Freeman Spogli Institute at Stanford University and former US Ambassador to Ukraine (1998–2000), at the 18th annual Kyiv Security Forum “Darkness or Dawn: Is Light Ahead?”According to Pifer, for decades the United States carried the primary burden for European security, while many European countries underinvested in defence. However, the situation has begun to change. “Last summer, we saw significant shifts – European countries began increasing their defence spending to 3.5% of GDP,” he noted.Pifer emphasised that rhetoric regarding the reduction of the country's international role intensified in the US, including ideas of withdrawing from NATO.“And that would be a mistake. A less stable Europe is not in the interests of the United States,’ the expert said.He emphasised that any weakening of transatlantic unity could also affect the global standoff with China, as the support of allies remains critical.Pifer pointed out that since the beginning of 2025, the US has not virtually provided new military assistance to Ukraine, despite continued public support.“This refers either to previously funded aid or to weaponry purchased by Europeans. Over 60% of US citizens are in favour of continuing support, and this position also prevails in the Senate,” he noted.In his view, the US military presence in Europe is a key factor in deterring russia. “Roughly 100,000 American troops in Europe send a clear signal that halts further russian expansion.”He emphasised that strengthening Ukraine is the most effective strategy.“It is essential to provide Ukraine with sufficient resources to stop Putin and constrain his further ambitions. Deterring russia comes at a cost, but failing to do so will cost far more,” the expert concluded.“Open Ukraine” is an international foundation established in 2007 on the initiative of Arseniy Yatsenyuk to strengthen Ukraine’s international standing. Each year, it organises the Kyiv Security Forum – Ukraine’s leading international platform for discussing war and peace – as well as the Youth Kyiv Security Forum, aimed at fostering a new generation of Ukrainian leaders.<o:p></o:p>

“Tensions rise in the US over support for Ukraine and NATO’s role” – Steven Pifer

Preserving the international liberal order established after the Second World War remains a fundamental national and value-based interest for the United States. This was stated by John Herbst, Senior Director of the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center and former US Ambassador to Ukraine (2003–2006), at the 18th annual Kyiv Security Forum “Darkness or Dawn: Is Light Ahead?”“I believe that America has both strong national interests and strong value-based interests in defending the international liberal order that we, together with our allies and partners, established at the end of the Second World War,” Herbst said. The diplomat noted that this interest is not fully understood by some influential figures within the “America First” movement, due in part to the experience of military campaigns in the Middle East, which is mistakenly compared to the support for Ukraine.“It is strange that people who call themselves realists argue that our intervention and our support for Ukraine is comparable to the deployment of American troops in the Middle East. This is despite the fact that we have not lost a single American soldier, pilot, or sailor in Europe while helping Ukraine,” he emphasised.Commenting on the situation within the Republican Party, the former Ambassador stated that the vast majority of Republicans, including MAGA supporters, support decisive actions on the international stage, despite the “loud voices” of certain isolationists. He added that criticizing aid to Ukraine while supporting interventions elsewhere is “not a very realistic” approach.Kyiv Security Forum (KSF) is an annual international event launched in 2007 on the initiative of Arseniy Yatsenyuk Open Ukraine Foundation. This year’s Forum is taking place on 23-24 April.

“The US has both national and value-based interests in maintaining the international liberal order” – John Herbst 

Viewing military aid to Ukraine as “burden sharing” is misguided, as such support represents a strategic investment in the national security of both the United States and Europe. This was stated by Laura Cooper, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (2017–2025), at the 18th annual Kyiv Security Forum “Darkness or Dawn: Is Light Ahead?”“I would like to start with a brief clarification of terminology. One term that truly triggers me is “burden sharing”, Cooper said, referring to how support for Ukraine is often framed.According to her, there has recently been a shift from “burden sharing” to “burden shifting”, but both terms should be abandoned. “This is about investing in our security—in the national security of the United States and the security of European nations. It is a joint investment,” she emphasised.Cooper also pointed out that public opinion in the US continues to support assistance to Ukraine: “The majority of Americans want to support Ukraine by providing weapons and equipment.”Addressing the issue of “fair sharing,” Cooper acknowledged expectations that Europe should contribute “as much as, or more than, the United States.” However, she pointed out that this is already happening: “If you look at the period prior to the halt of new US security assistance at the end of 2024, investments in security aid to Ukraine from the US and Europe were roughly equal — over $60 billion each.”She added that “in terms of economic aid, Europe has actually surpassed the United States,” and as a percentage of GDP, the US ranked “13th or 14th among nations in its level of investment in Ukraine.”At the same time, the lack of public awareness in the US remains a challenge. “The bad news is that most Americans are unaware of this. There is very little visibility into what Europe is actually doing to support Ukraine,” the former US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense stated.Kyiv Security Forum (KSF) is an annual international event launched in 2007 on the initiative of Arseniy Yatsenyuk Open Ukraine Foundation. This year’s Forum is taking place on 23-24 April.

“Support for Ukraine should be viewed as a joint security investment, not “burden sharing” – Laura Cooper

Ukraine’s leadership strategy in its relations with US President Donald Trump combines public gratitude with pragmatic bargaining and a demonstration of its own subjectivity on the international stage. This was emphasised by Stephen Sestanovich, Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and former US Ambassador, at the 18th annual Kyiv Security Forum “Darkness or Dawn: Is Light Ahead?”“Zelenskyy and his colleagues have chosen a dual strategy for dealing with Trump. The first is to say “thank you” as often as possible. The second is to make a proposition: “Now let’s make a deal, let’s discuss the details of an agreement on mineral resources or anything else,” Sestanovich stated.Commenting on the Ukrainian President’s recent visits to Middle Eastern countries, the diplomat noted that Kyiv is using these engagements to demonstrate its importance to Washington. “Zelenskyy is trying to show: “I am not someone who just says “thank you”. I am someone you must take seriously.” This has proved to be an effective message. He is showing that he has cards to play and can advance his own interests, and that captures Trump’s attention,” he emphasised.Analysing US domestic policy, Sestanovich argued that the “America First” slogan should not be interpreted as a direct abandonment of allies. In his view, both the Republican Party and American society remain supporters of NATO and the global alliance system.“The President has personal obsessions, but they are not widely supported. It is important not to mistake these obsessions for something with a solid political foundation,” he said.The Republican Party is not homogenous. Members of Congress are beginning to speak out against the President because they are concerned about how this worldview will affect the election results in November,” noted the Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.Finally, he observed that the term “rules-based international order” is not popular among ordinary Americans. Therefore, US leadership should be framed in terms of the “strength and effectiveness of the Western bloc.”Kyiv Security Forum (KSF) is an annual international event launched in 2007 on the initiative of Arseniy Yatsenyuk Open Ukraine Foundation. This year’s Forum is taking place on 23-24 April.

“Zelenskyy is showing Trump he has “cards” – Ambassador Stephen Sestanovich

<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/YURI_5558_e158302bb5.JPG" alt="YURI5558.JPG" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_YURI_5558_e158302bb5.JPG 234w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_YURI_5558_e158302bb5.JPG 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_YURI_5558_e158302bb5.JPG 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_YURI_5558_e158302bb5.JPG 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">The 18th annual Kyiv Security Forum, themed “Darkness or Dawn: Is Light Ahead?”, showcased innovations from defense companies – leaders in modern technology.Close cooperation between the state and Ukraine’s military-industrial complex is rapidly strengthening military capabilities and saving soldiers' lives and health."We manufacture FPVs, delivery vehicles, repeaters, kamikaze and bomber drones. "In fact, we're creating our own FPV ecosystem," said Dmytro, an engineer at Sky Reaper.At their booth, the company showcased a kamikaze drone with a 10-inch frame, as well as repeaters for controlling the drone from greater distances."All of this is to save soldiers' lives and get them out... We have a kamikaze drone with an interesting control system enabled by LTE connectivity on a 15-inch frame. This allows the operators to sit, so to speak, in Kyiv and practice targeting in Zaporizhzhia,” Dmytro said.He noted that the company's main goal is to manufacture drones entirely in Ukraine and transition away from using Chinese components.<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/1_vistavka_48f98f008b.jfif" alt="1 виставка.jfif" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_1_vistavka_48f98f008b.jfif 234w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_1_vistavka_48f98f008b.jfif 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_1_vistavka_48f98f008b.jfif 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_1_vistavka_48f98f008b.jfif 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">Polina, a representative from Buntar Aerospace, spoke about the Buntar-3 reconnaissance drone on display at their booth. This drone operates in the most challenging areas on the front lines.“It’s a copter-airplane hybrid; it can take off and land vertically. That means it doesn’t need additional launch pads — you just set it down and it takes off. &nbsp;You may have seen how the defense forces recently struck Donetsk Airport — it was actually this drone that guided the strike. It also has a really cool, high-quality camera,” noted the company representative.<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/2_fbce4dd9ef.jfif" alt="2.jfif" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_2_fbce4dd9ef.jfif 234w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_2_fbce4dd9ef.jfif 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_2_fbce4dd9ef.jfif 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_2_fbce4dd9ef.jfif 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">Dmytro, a representative from TAF Industries, explained that the company’s booth features reconnaissance drones, two types of Shahed fighter drones, and fiber-optic drones. "We have our own developments, such as our own initiation board, a remote control board, and an automatic guidance module, among many other innovations," he added.Since July 2023, TAF Industries has operated in the defense technology market and has been gradually transitioning to Ukrainian components.<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/3_vistavka_ec026470d6.JPG" alt="3 виставка.JPG" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_3_vistavka_ec026470d6.JPG 234w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_3_vistavka_ec026470d6.JPG 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_3_vistavka_ec026470d6.JPG 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_3_vistavka_ec026470d6.JPG 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">Skiftech develops military training technologies, including tactical simulators, which are currently being used by the Ukrainian Armed Forces, the National Guard, the &nbsp;State Border Guard Service and other units of the Ukrainian Defence Forces."At the heart of our system is a personal kit for infantry soldiers... Our equipment can also neutralize drones," said Maxim, a Skiftech representative.He noted that, according to reviews from military personnel trained with the company's equipment, acquiring these skills significantly increased their chances of saving lives during the first few months of combat operations. "By about 30%," he added.<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/4_17e88d3767.JPG" alt="4.JPG" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_4_17e88d3767.JPG 234w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_4_17e88d3767.JPG 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_4_17e88d3767.JPG 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_4_17e88d3767.JPG 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">Open Ukraine is an international foundation established by Arseniy Yatsenyuk in July 2007 to strengthen Ukraine's authority in the world. The foundation organizes the Kyiv Security Forum every year. This leading international discussion platform focuses on issues of war and peace. The foundation also organizes the Youth Kyiv Security Forum to develop a new generation of Ukrainian leaders.The 18th annual Kyiv Security Forum, which was themed “Darkness or Dawn: Is Light Ahead?”, took place in Kyiv on April 23–24.

Defense innovations that strengthen Ukraine’s military capabilities were presented at KSF-2026

The Kremlin has not changed its position – Russia is only prepared to negotiate if Ukraine surrenders. This was stated by Danylo Lubkivsky, former Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine and member of the Security Council of the Kyiv Security Forum, <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WP8XfgYkOI">on Suspilne</a>.“The Kremlin has not budged an inch from its position. They are saying as clearly as possible, both to Ukrainians and to the whole world: we are ready for negotiations if you capitulate. Full stop,” the diplomat emphasised.Lubkivsky described all discussions about phone calls and contacts between the parties as “empty words”. “The main question is what will be discussed, what the essence of the negotiations is. On the eve of 9 May, Ushakov mentioned the possibility of Russia withdrawing from the negotiations, taking advantage of the situation in the Middle East. Russia is playing for different audiences, including its own. But the aims and objectives of the Russian dictator and the war criminals surrounding him have not changed,” noted the member of the KSF Security Council.Apart from that, he commented on the shift in Putin’s rhetoric regarding Volodymyr Zelenskyy during the parade. “The situation surrounding the parade is the ultimate humiliation for the Russian dictator, who began very loudly and menacingly, but ended up asking Ukraine not to shell Red Square so that they could hold the parade. This is a humiliating, pathetic trajectory, which is exactly what Putin deserves,” emphasised Lubkivsky.According to him, the shift in rhetoric is “a subconscious reflection of the feat achieved by Ukrainians, who stood up to and repelled the Moscow horde and continue to hold back the aggressor.” However, the diplomat cautioned: this is merely the outward, superficial aspect of the situation. “The enemy remains extremely dangerous,” Lubkivsky concluded.

The Kremlin has not changed its position – Russia is only prepared to negotiate if Ukraine surrenders. This was stated by Danylo Lubkivsky, former Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine and member of the Security Council of the Kyiv Security Forum, on Suspilne.

Lubkivsky: The Kremlin’s demand remains the same – surrender, and then we’ll talk

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, founder of The Invictus Games Foundation, published an article on his official website <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://sussex.com/">Sussex.com</a> following the first day of the Kyiv Security Forum (KSF), in which he called Ukraine a driving force behind new global standards of resilience.Following his participation in the 18th KSF, he provided a detailed account of his impressions of the event and Ukraine’s role in the modern world. The article, titled "Day One in Kyiv: Honouring Service, Shaping the Future," served as a manifesto of support for the Ukrainian veterans' movement and strategic dialogue in the Ukrainian capital.Duke specifically highlighted the calibre of the Kyiv Security Forum, calling it one of Eastern Europe's most important platforms. For Harry, this event was not merely a political platform, but a place where ‘clarity’ regarding global threats is forged. He emphasised that the discussions at the Forum help the international community avoid becoming paralysed by the realities of war.Prince Harry called Ukraine a “global innovator”. He believes that Ukraine is not only defending itself but also “adapting and innovating in real time”, and that what Ukraine is doing today is not merely resistance but true global leadership.Reflecting on the panel discussion on the reintegration of soldiers in which he took part, Prince Harry emphasised that Ukraine is currently reshaping the global understanding of support for veterans, and that the Ukrainian experience will find its way into textbooks for other nations.In his article, the Duke stressed that the struggle in Ukraine is not isolated – it is a battle for the integrity of democratic systems across the world.The article places particular emphasis on the ‘invisible wounds’ of war. The Duke of Sussex called on the world to build support systems around real human experience, rather than dry political frameworks."War is not only fought on the battlefield. It is fought in the mind," he wrote, calling for long-term psychological support for veterans and their families.Prince Harry concluded that attending the Forum and interacting with Ukrainians provides an answer to the question of whether there is "light ahead." In his view, it is the voices of Ukrainian veterans and their resilience that shape the future the whole world will follow.The Kyiv Security Forum (KSF) is an annual international event launched in 2007 on the initiative of Arseniy Yatsenyuk’s Open Ukraine Foundation. The 18th Forum, entitled “Darkness or Dawn: Is There Light Ahead?”, took place in Kyiv on 23–24 April.

Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, founder of The Invictus Games Foundation, published an article on his official website Sussex.com following the first day of the Kyiv Security Forum (KSF), in which he called Ukraine a driving force behind new global standards of resilience.

"This is not just resilience. This is leadership in real time," Prince Harry shared his impressions of his visit to Kyiv on his official website

<div class="raw-html-embed"><iframe width="100%" height="560" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fgK0H7zK4Ps?si=AdVTegDsoGX6A7-Y" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen=""></iframe></div>Ukraine cannot relinquish its territories and cannot capitulate. The only chance to save the world from chaos lies in helping Ukraine to prevail. This was emphasised by Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Chairman of the Kyiv Security Forum and Prime Minister of Ukraine from 2014 to 2016, during an interview on the Polish television channel TVP World.Yatsenyuk described the negotiations with Russia as “sham”. “To conclude any peace agreement, we need truly honest and reliable peace talks with Russia. What is happening now has nothing to do with genuine peace talks. I said over a year ago: the Russians are playing a dirty game in the style of the KGB,” he noted.In his view, Putin is pursuing three objectives: to drag things out, to avoid secondary sanctions, and to show the world, and in particular the Global South, that Russia is supposedly seeking peace. “War criminal Putin wants Ukraine to capitulate. There is no real chance that Ukraine will be able to achieve a just peace through talks with Russia. But we can achieve peace by putting pressure on Russia,” emphasised the KSF Chairman. Yatsenyuk rejected the possibility of any concessions to the aggressor, drawing a parallel with the run-up to the Second World War, “when the West tried to appease Hitler with concessions – ceding territories and easing sanctions”.“One cannot uphold international law by appeasing the aggressor and effectively violating that very same international law […] A policy of appeasement always leads to a new war. Full stop,” he stressed.The Chairman of the KSF put forward three arguments against territorial concessions: this contradicts international law, the Constitution of Ukraine, and most importantly – Putin seeks not concessions, but the seizure of the whole of Ukraine. “He wants to ‘undermine’ the European Union. And, together with his friends and allies, such as China, North Korea, Iran and other pariah states, to establish a new world order. And in this global chaos, there is no place for a leader of the free world, such as the United States, and no place for the foundation of the free world, which is the EU,” Yatsenyuk noted.“The only chance to save this mad world is to help Ukraine win the war. And we have the tools to do so. We are a very, very strong nation. And what is needed? We need the political courage of our allies,” concluded the KSF Chairman.

Ukraine cannot relinquish its territories and cannot capitulate. The only chance to save the world from chaos lies in helping Ukraine to prevail. This was emphasised by Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Chairman of the Kyiv Security Forum and Prime Minister of Ukraine from 2014 to 2016, during an interview on the Polish television channel TVP World.

Yatsenyuk: A policy of appeasement towards the aggressor always leads to a new war

Arseniy Yatsenyuk, head of the Kyiv Security Forum and former Prime Minister of Ukraine, stated in an <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/05/28/putin-will-try-to-recruit-any-envoy-sent-to-talks-ukraines-former-pm-says">interview with Euronews</a> in Brussels that the Kremlin is not interested in genuine peace talks, and that Russia will use any negotiation process to stall for time, pressure the West, and strengthen its own position.Commenting on discussions within the European Union regarding a potential representative for direct contacts with Moscow, Yatsenyuk emphasised that Vladimir Putin views diplomacy as a tool for influence and manipulation.“Please, do not underestimate this war criminal. He is no fool. He is a KGB agent,” Yatsenyuk stated.According to him, the Russian president assesses every interlocutor through the prism of strength and weakness. “He always senses whether you are weak or strong. That’s why he tests every person he meets,” the former prime minister said.He believes that the Kremlin agrees to diplomatic contacts only when it allows them to buy time or weaken Western unity. “Putin is neither seeking nor ready for any negotiations at this stage. If he does agree to a negotiator, it will be for one reason only— to outmanoeuvre us, buy time, and make life difficult for us,” he noted.According to Yatsenyuk, the issue is not about the specific name of a potential EU representative, but about Europe’s ability to demonstrate strength and political unity.“The only language Putin understands is the language of strength and power,” he emphasised.The former prime minister also stated that the Russian president is not ready to accept any compromises today. “Putin is not ready to accept anyone. But he is ready to accept the capitulation of Ukraine, and in fact, of Europe. And we must realise this,” Yatsenyuk said.He linked the escalation of Russian threats against EU and NATO countries to Moscow’s setbacks on the front lines and internal problems within the Russian economy.“Putin is losing the war. He expected to capture Ukraine back in 2014. Then he launched a full-scale war and was convinced he would capture Kyiv in three days,” Yatsenyuk recalled.According to him, the Kremlin is increasingly trying to intimidate European societies to weaken support for Ukraine. “Russia poses a huge threat to the security of the European Union. They want to intimidate the people of the EU and force Europeans to turn their backs on Ukrainians.”Separately, Yatsenyuk drew attention to China’s role, calling Beijing a strategic partner of Moscow and an accomplice to Russian aggression. “China has provided the lifeblood for Putin’s Russia — both financially and through the supply of dual-use materials,” he stated.At the same time, the KSF Chairman suggested that it is precisely China’s influence that could potentially create the conditions for genuine negotiations in the future.He also criticised the West’s previous diplomatic attempts to reach an agreement with the Kremlin, stating that Moscow had used them for manipulation and attempts to divide the unity of Ukraine’s allies.In conclusion, Arseniy Yatsenyuk emphasized that Europe’s security directly depends on the outcome of Russia’s war against Ukraine: “Europeans must realize: you can only be safe in one case — if we, Ukrainians, win this war.”

Arseniy Yatsenyuk, head of the Kyiv Security Forum and former Prime Minister of Ukraine, stated in an interview with Euronews in Brussels that the Kremlin is not interested in genuine peace talks, and that Russia will use any negotiation process to stall for time, pressure the West, and strengthen its own position.