News

When Putin annexed Crimea and deployed troops in Donbas in 2014, the state treasury held $10,000, the army was basically non-existent, and the country was deeply infiltrated by Russian agents. This was stated by the Chairman of the Kyiv Security Forum, Prime Minister of Ukraine in 2014-2016, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, on the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KF4ZjqIKheU">Kyiv Post's Off the Record </a>podcast with Canadian Ambassador Natalka Cmoc.‘Twelve years ago, Putin illegally annexed Crimea. Then he deployed his proxy forces and troops in the east of Ukraine. At that very moment, I was taking the oath of office as Prime Minister of Ukraine, and the state treasury had... ten thousand dollars to cover the entire country,’ Yatsenyuk emphasised.The former prime minister added that the emptied treasury was only the visible part of the problem. "We had no army, no police, no local authorities, and basically no central government. The country was in ruins and deeply infiltrated by Russian agents. At that time, the head of the Security Service of Ukraine was a Russian citizen. The Minister of Defence was also a Russian citizen. It was a completely pro-Russian environment. And despite this, we survived. Having no combat-ready army, we were able to increase defence spending to 5% of GDP," Yatsenyuk emphasised.The Chairman of the KSF explained how these reforms played a decisive role during the full-scale invasion. ‘We laid the foundation for a strong, stable and secure Ukraine. It was a kind of shelter – not a military one, but a strong shelter for the Ukrainian nation. This is what allowed us to withstand the full-scale invasion of 2022,’ Yatsenyuk emphasised.

When Putin annexed Crimea and deployed troops in Donbas in 2014, the state treasury held $10,000, the army was basically non-existent, and the country was deeply infiltrated by Russian agents. This was stated by the Chairman of the Kyiv Security Forum, Prime Minister of Ukraine in 2014-2016, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, on the Kyiv Post's Off the Record podcast with Canadian Ambassador Natalka Cmoc.

Yatsenyuk: The 2014 reforms gave Ukraine the resources to survive in 2022

<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/1500x0_7_0712d4f699.jpg" alt="1500x0 (7).jpg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_1500x0_7_0712d4f699.jpg 234w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_1500x0_7_0712d4f699.jpg 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_1500x0_7_0712d4f699.jpg 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_1500x0_7_0712d4f699.jpg 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Chairman of the Kyiv Security Forum, Prime Minister of Ukraine (2014–2016), is sceptical about the current diplomatic process surrounding russia's war against Ukraine and urges not to confuse the concepts. According to him, what is currently taking place can hardly be described as peace negotiations.He made these remarks during the Kyiv Security Forum Special Session on the Global Situation and the Prospects for Peace in Ukraine "12 Years of Russia's War Against Ukraine: What Comes Next?"The politician drew attention to the composition of the russian delegation and to moscow's rhetoric, noting that russia itself refers to this format as "consultations".<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/zw_e1fab90fe1.jpeg" alt="zw.jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_zw_e1fab90fe1.jpeg 234w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_zw_e1fab90fe1.jpeg 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_zw_e1fab90fe1.jpeg 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_zw_e1fab90fe1.jpeg 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">"What kind of peace negotiations can we be talking about if the russian side is represented by russia's main intelligence agency (GRU)? This is the first time I have heard of diplomatic negotiations being conducted by the military. Putin's tactic is obvious. He sent the GRU there with only one goal and one expectation that Ukraine would begin surrendering its territory," Yatsenyuk said.At the same time, he believes that the Ukrainian authorities are doing the right thing by participating in this process, because the strategic goal remains unchanged – preserving the engagement of the U.S."The Ukrainian government is doing the right thing by participating in these talks, because we need to keep the Americans within our orbit," Yatsenyuk emphasised.In his opinion, there are currently no grounds to believe that putin is ready to sign a genuine peace agreement. He described the continuation of the war as the most realistic scenario, while a temporary ceasefire remains possible, though less likely."A ceasefire and a peace agreement are two very different things. A ceasefire is only possible if russia realises that the cost of continuing the war has become personally unacceptable for putin," Arseniy Yatsenyuk noted.According to him, such a scenario could emerge only as a result of a combination of factors: massive losses suffered by the russian army, a critical state of russia's economy, a continuous supply of weapons and finances to Ukraine, and strict enforcement of sanctions."If the West continues to supply weapons, provides Ukraine with financial support, imposes sanctions – and not just imposes them, but enforces those already in place – and deprives russia of resources, then this could lead putin to recognise that a temporary ceasefire is necessary," the politician concluded.Open Ukraine is an international foundation established by Arseniy Yatsenyuk in July 2007 to strengthen Ukraine's authority in the world. The foundation organises the Kyiv Security Forum every year. This leading international discussion platform focuses on issues of war and peace. The foundation also organises the Youth Kyiv Security Forum to develop a new generation of Ukrainian leaders.

Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Chairman of the Kyiv Security Forum, Prime Minister of Ukraine (2014–2016), is skeptical about the current diplomatic process surrounding russia's war against Ukraine and urges not to confuse the concepts. According to him, what is currently taking place can hardly be described as peace negotiations.

Arseniy Yatsenyuk on peace talks: the presence of russia's GRU signals putin's expectation of Ukrainian territorial concessions 

<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/1500x0_6_f98bc2467f.jpeg" alt="1500x0 (6).jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_1500x0_6_f98bc2467f.jpeg 234w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_1500x0_6_f98bc2467f.jpeg 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_1500x0_6_f98bc2467f.jpeg 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_1500x0_6_f98bc2467f.jpeg 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">Despite ongoing discussions about isolationism and changes in the style of American politics, the U.S. is not withdrawing from its global security role. General David Petraeus, Member of the KSF Security Council, Commander of U.S. Central Command (2008–2010), Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (2011–2012), made this statement during the Kyiv Security Forum Special Session on the Global Situation and the Prospects for Peace in Ukraine "12 Years of Russia's War Against Ukraine: What Comes Next?"He noted that the slogan "America First" is more and more often interpreted as "America Alone"; however, in his opinion, this interpretation is exaggerated. U.S. history has already seen periods of deep internal turbulence – from protests against the Vietnam War to the political crises of the 1970s. Yet none of these led to a strategic rollback of the country's international role.David Petraeus acknowledges that the current U.S. President, Donald Trump, negotiates in a fundamentally different manner, demonstrating toughness and a tendency for pressure before dialogue begins. At the same time, real politics is shaped not by rhetoric but by congressional decisions, budgets, and long-term national interests. "It is important to pay attention not only to statements, but to money and politics. Congress did not allow a significant reduction of the U.S. presence in Europe," the U.S. General emphasised.<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/10_0b15275678.jpeg" alt="10.jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_10_0b15275678.jpeg 234w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_10_0b15275678.jpeg 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_10_0b15275678.jpeg 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_10_0b15275678.jpeg 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">According to him, the U.S. spends more than twice as much on defence as all European countries collectively, which clearly makes it indispensable to the Western security system.At the same time, the General stressed that the war in Ukraine has become a catalyst for transformation for armed forces around the world, and that allies must learn rapidly from Ukraine's experience – primarily in the areas of unmanned systems, troop organization, and innovation. "We must change our concept of warfare and our organisational structure. Ukraine already has a separate branch of the armed forces – Unmanned Systems Forces. This is the future," he said.In the General's opinion, technological solutions enable a country with a smaller economy and population to effectively resist a much larger adversary.David Petraeus also emphasised that the U.S. economy is currently demonstrating high stability, productivity, and innovation, and that the U.S. remains the primary magnet for foreign investment. This creates a strong resource base for long-term leadership in the security domain.In conclusion, he noted that allies must not only support Ukraine, but also learn from it, as the Ukrainian experience is now shaping a new model of modern warfare. "I do not believe that we, as allies, are incapable of learning these lessons. Ukraine is already showing what the future of war looks like," the General pointed out.Open Ukraine is an international foundation established by Arseniy Yatsenyuk in July 2007 to strengthen Ukraine's authority in the world. The foundation organises the Kyiv Security Forum every year. This leading international discussion platform focuses on issues of war and peace. The foundation also organises the Youth Kyiv Security Forum to develop a new generation of Ukrainian leaders.

Despite ongoing discussions about isolationism and changes in the style of American politics, the U.S. is not withdrawing from its global security role. General David Petraeus, Member of the KSF Security Council, Commander of U.S. Central Command (2008–2010), Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (2011–2012), made this statement during the Kyiv Security Forum Special Session on the Global Situation and the Prospects for Peace in Ukraine "12 Years of Russia's War Against Ukraine: What Comes Next?"

David Petraeus: The U.S. remains a critically important ally for Europe's security

<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/17_6685115f91.jpeg" alt="17.jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_17_6685115f91.jpeg 233w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_17_6685115f91.jpeg 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_17_6685115f91.jpeg 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_17_6685115f91.jpeg 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">Ukraine's partners, which are not superpowers, have realised that joining forces is the most effective way to help Ukraine. Ambassador of Canada to Ukraine Natalka Cmoc stated this during the Kyiv Security Forum Special Session on the Global Situation and the Prospects for Peace in Ukraine "12 Years of Russia's War Against Ukraine: What Comes Next?""Ukraine perceives us as an alliance and trusts us. We have consistently demonstrated the strength of our alliance through military training assistance, the Coalition of the Willing, and our willingness to provide security guarantees in support of Ukraine when the time comes for a truce. We are strong allies,” she said.<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/19_ad3f270967.jpeg" alt="19.jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_19_ad3f270967.jpeg 234w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_19_ad3f270967.jpeg 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_19_ad3f270967.jpeg 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_19_ad3f270967.jpeg 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">The diplomat believes that so-called "middle powers" can do a lot for Ukraine by joining forces. "I think we have realised that if we pool our resources, we will have a much greater opportunity to support Ukraine," she emphasised.At the same time, she drew attention to the relations that all the states involved have with China. “It is also important for Canada to have peace with this country. We have a large Asian diaspora in Canada, which is of great economic importance. We recognise that we must diversify our economy. Asia and the Middle East are important partners for us in this regard. This includes Saudi Arabia and other countries. This is the reality for Canada today. We are focusing on this diversity and working in this direction," Natalka Cmoc concluded.Open Ukraine is an international foundation established by Arseniy Yatsenyuk in July 2007 to strengthen Ukraine's authority in the world. The foundation organises the Kyiv Security Forum every year. This leading international discussion platform focuses on issues of war and peace. The foundation also organises the Youth Kyiv Security Forum to develop a new generation of Ukrainian leaders.

Ukraine's partners, which are not superpowers, have realized that joining forces is the most effective way to help Ukraine. Ambassador of Canada to Ukraine Natalka Cmoc stated this during the Kyiv Security Forum Special Session on the Global Situation and the Prospects for Peace in Ukraine "12 Years of Russia's War Against Ukraine: What Comes Next?"

Canadian Ambassador Natalka Cmoc: "We have consistently demonstrated the strength of our alliance"

<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/1500x0_5_013f9554b5.jpeg" alt="1500x0 (5).jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_1500x0_5_013f9554b5.jpeg 236w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_1500x0_5_013f9554b5.jpeg 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_1500x0_5_013f9554b5.jpeg 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_1500x0_5_013f9554b5.jpeg 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">European countries must significantly increase their investment in "hard power," enhance their defense capabilities, and strive for greater strategic autonomy while also maintaining strong and constructive relations with the United States.Ambassador of the United Kingdom to Ukraine, Neil Crompton, stated this during the Kyiv Security Forum Special Session on the Global Situation and the Prospects for Peace in Ukraine "12 Years of Russia's War Against Ukraine: What Comes Next?"The diplomat stressed that, despite the change in political styles in Washington, the long-term relationship between Europe and the U.S. remains the foundation of security. At the same time, Europe itself must respond more quickly to the challenges russia has created since 2014. "The main lesson is that Europe needs to invest more in defence, become stronger, and take more responsibility for its own security while maintaining strategic relations with the United States," Neil Crompton said.According to Crompton, many European capitals are already undergoing "epochal changes" in defence policy. Investments in defence have increased significantly, particularly in Germany and other EU countries. This is a direct consequence of putin's actions and the realisation that Ukraine's security is inextricably linked to that of Europe.The British diplomat emphasises that the UK, together with France and other partners, is actively coordinating security guarantees for Ukraine, particularly within the Coalition of the Willing. This includes sanctions along with a long-term enhancement of Europe's military-industrial capabilities, modernization of nuclear deterrence, and development of conventional armed forces."What has happened has radically changed strategic thinking in the UK about restoring our nuclear deterrence capabilities and strengthening conventional forces," he said.At the same time, Neil Crompton emphasises that any negotiation process is only possible if Ukraine is confident that russia will receive an immediate and powerful response if it attacks again. "You have the best army in Europe and the most combat experience. We are all learning from you. You have already changed NATO's approach to warfare," the diplomat said.According to Crompton, partners are discussing the possibility of financing the rearmament and reequipment of Ukrainian forces and providing them with modern technology and weapons. He also indicated the importance of sending a political signal to the kremlin and the willingness of some European countries to consider stationing their forces on land, in the air, and at sea — particularly in the Black Sea region — with the support of the United States.Open Ukraine is an international foundation established by Arseniy Yatsenyuk in July 2007 to strengthen Ukraine's authority in the world. The foundation organises the Kyiv Security Forum every year. This leading international discussion platform focuses on issues of war and peace. The foundation also organises the Youth Kyiv Security Forum to develop a new generation of Ukrainian leaders.

European countries must significantly increase their investment in "hard power," enhance their defense capabilities, and strive for greater strategic autonomy while also maintaining strong and constructive relations with the United States.

Ukraine is already changing NATO's military mindset, – British ambassador Neil Crompton

<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/1500x0_17_0e84a482fc.jpg" alt="1500x0 (17).jpg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_1500x0_17_0e84a482fc.jpg 241w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_1500x0_17_0e84a482fc.jpg 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_1500x0_17_0e84a482fc.jpg 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_1500x0_17_0e84a482fc.jpg 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">Denmark is preparing for any developments and increasing its defence spending.Chargé d`affaires ad interim of Denmark in Ukraine, Lars Olaf Søvndahl Petersen, made this statement during the Kyiv Security Forum Special Session on the Global Situation and the Prospects for Peace in Ukraine "12 Years of Russia's War Against Ukraine: What Comes Next?""This year, defence spending will reach 5% of GDP. Part of these funds will go to supporting Ukraine. We are announcing an additional USD 400 million that will be allocated to Ukraine this year for military needs. This is our answer to the question of whether we can cooperate effectively with Ukraine and what lessons we should learn from our Ukrainian partners to withstand and prepare for what may come our way," he said.At the same time, the diplomat stressed that Denmark does not ignore external threats or harsh statements by leaders of other countries."This has forced us to be realistic. Over the past few years, we have been quite active in supporting the Ukrainian struggle for freedom, as well as the struggle for European freedom. At the same time, we are preparing for any possible developments, whatever they may be," Lars Olaf Søvndahl Petersen summarised.Open Ukraine is an international foundation established by Arseniy Yatsenyuk in July 2007 to strengthen Ukraine's authority in the world. The foundation organises the Kyiv Security Forum every year. This leading international discussion platform focuses on issues of war and peace. The foundation also organises the Youth Kyiv Security Forum to develop a new generation of Ukrainian leaders.

Denmark is preparing for any developments and increasing its defense spending.
Chargé D`Affaires a.i. of Denmark in Ukraine Lars Olaf Sovndahl Petersen made this statement during the Kyiv Security Forum Special Session on the Global Situation and the Prospects for Peace in Ukraine "12 Years of Russia's War Against Ukraine: What Comes Next?"

We are preparing for any possible developments, whatever they may be – chargé d`affaires a.i. of Denmark in Ukraine: 

Over 12 years of war against Ukraine, Russia has spent nearly $800 billion – $350 billion more than Ukraine and its allies (the US, EU and UK) combined, and this figure will soon reach a trillion. This was stated by the Director of the Kyiv Security Forum, diplomat Danylo Lubkivsky, on Hromadske Radio following a special KSF event, ‘Twelve years of war. What next?’."According to estimates by KSF experts, Ukraine has spent approximately $300 billion on the war over the past 12 years. The United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom together have spent approximately $150 billion. Russia, on the other hand, has spent nearly $800 billion. That is $350 billion more than Ukraine and its allies combined. In fact, Russia will spend a trillion dollars in the near future,‘ said the KSF Director.Lubkivsky described these expenditures as money spent on ‘Putin’s maniacal obsession with minimal results’. ‘Putin has been in power for 26 years, and for almost half of that time he has been waging war against Ukraine,’ the diplomat added.At the same time, the Director of the KSF stressed that in the 12th year of the war, the world order is threatened not only by authoritarian regimes.‘The world order is under attack not only from authoritarian criminals such as Putin, but also from within the democratic environment. The very principles and norms of international law are being undermined, and the concepts of territorial integrity and the inviolability of internationally recognised borders are being called into question,’ Lubkivsky said.The diplomat explained the main purpose of the special event organised by the KSF, initiated by the Prime Minister of Ukraine in 2014-2016, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, which was attended by the former director of the US Central Intelligence Agency, General David Petraeus, and the ambassadors of Germany, France, Britain, Denmark and Canada.‘The main goal of the event is to emphasise that this is not just about four years of full-scale Russian aggression against Ukraine, but about 12 years of war, which began on 20 February 2014 with Russia's occupation of Crimea and then its invasion of certain areas of Donetsk and Luhansk regions,’ Lubkivsky said.The Director of the KSF summarised three key conclusions that were made during the session."First, Putin is not winning. Second, partners need to increase pressure and help Ukraine. This is the unanimous position of all participants, from ambassadors to the representative of Denmark. Third, Europe has already woken up. I often say that Ukraine has made a big investment in Western security: we have given Europe time to act and strengthen its defences. And this process is already yielding results. Our partners recognise the mistakes of the past," Lubkivsky concluded.

Over 12 years of war against Ukraine, Russia has spent nearly $800 billion – $350 billion more than Ukraine and its allies (the US, EU and UK) combined, and this figure will soon reach a trillion. This was stated by the Director of the Kyiv Security Forum, diplomat Danylo Lubkivsky, on Hromadske Radio following a special KSF event, ‘Twelve years of war. What next?’.

Director of the Kyiv Security Forum Lubkivsky: Over the past 12 years, Ukraine has made a huge investment in Western security

Ukrainians demonstrate the highest level of positive attitude towards Great Britain, Canada, France and Germany. Negative attitudes are highest towards Russia. These are the findings of the survey commissioned by the Kyiv Security Forum and conducted by The Razumkov Center on the eve of the Munich Security Conference, which will take place on February 13-15.The survey covers Ukrainians' expectations regarding the end of the war, their trust in the state, other countries and international institutions, as well as the resilience of households in the face of Russian attacks on energy infrastructure.<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/slajd_2_de61eb4ce2.jpeg" alt="слайд_2.jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_slajd_2_de61eb4ce2.jpeg 220w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_slajd_2_de61eb4ce2.jpeg 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_slajd_2_de61eb4ce2.jpeg 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_slajd_2_de61eb4ce2.jpeg 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">The respondents were most positive &nbsp;Great Britain, with a balance of +94.3% (the difference between positive and negative assessments). Compared to September 2025, positive attitudes towards Britain have increased – at that time, the balance was +78%.Canada (92.3%), France (87.5%) and Germany (83.5%) also received positive assessments. The positive balance of attitudes towards these countries has also increased compared to September last year.<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/dinamika_eng1_7a64ec349b.jpeg" alt="динаміка_eng1.jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_dinamika_eng1_7a64ec349b.jpeg 220w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_dinamika_eng1_7a64ec349b.jpeg 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_dinamika_eng1_7a64ec349b.jpeg 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_dinamika_eng1_7a64ec349b.jpeg 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">Over the last five months (compared to September), Ukrainians' positive attitude towards the US has decreased by 17.3%, with the balance remaining at +29.3%, which is significantly lower than that of European countries.Ukrainians also have a predominantly positive attitude towards international institutions. The balance of trust in the EU remains steady at +79.5%.At the same time, the balance of trust in NATO is +45%, which is almost half that of the EU. Over the past five months (compared to September), trust in NATO has declined – at that time, the indicator was +61.8%.Ukrainians have a predominantly negative attitude towards China – the balance is minus 51%. Twenty-five per cent of respondents have a positive attitude towards this country (5.7% are completely positive, 14.8% are mostly positive), while 71.5% have a negative attitude (37.1% are mostly negative, 34.4% are completely negative).The lowest level of positive attitude was recorded towards Russia – the balance is minus 98.1%.<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/dinamika_eng2_b31dcca0a1.jpeg" alt="динаміка_eng2.jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_dinamika_eng2_b31dcca0a1.jpeg 220w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_dinamika_eng2_b31dcca0a1.jpeg 500w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_dinamika_eng2_b31dcca0a1.jpeg 750w,https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_dinamika_eng2_b31dcca0a1.jpeg 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="1000px">The sociological survey was commissioned by the Kyiv Security Forum and conducted by The Razumkov Center on government-controlled Ukrainian territories from January 31-February 04, 2026, using phone interviews. A total of 1,003 respondents aged 18 and older living in all regions of Ukraine (except for the Autonomous Republic of Crimea) were interviewed. The survey was conducted among citizens who were in Ukraine at the time, in areas controlled by the Ukrainian government and covered by Ukrainian telephone operators. The structure of the sample population reflects the demographic structure of the adult population in the territories where the survey was conducted as of the beginning of 2022 (by macro-regions, age, gender, type of settlement). The theoretical sampling error does not exceed 3.2%.

Ukrainians demonstrate the highest level of positive attitude towards Great Britain, Canada, France and Germany. Negative attitudes are highest towards Russia. These are the findings of a sociological study prepared by the Razumkov Centre on behalf of the Kyiv Security Forum on the eve of the Munich Security Conference, which will take place on February 13-15.

The positive attitude of Ukrainians towards Britain and Canada is growing, while Russia ranks highest as the most hated country. Survey by the Kyiv Security Forum

83% of respondents support Ukraine's accession to the EU, while 71.3% support NATO membership. Compared to September 2025, Ukrainian support for both of these strategic issues has grown. These are the findings of the survey commissioned by the Kyiv Security Forum and conducted by The Razumkov Center on the eve of the Munich Security Conference, which will take place on February 13-15.The survey covers Ukrainians' expectations regarding the end of the war, their trust in the state, other countries and international institutions, as well as the resilience of households in the face of Russian attacks on energy infrastructure.EU accessionRespondents mainly support Ukraine's accession to the European Union. 83% of respondents are in favour of accession, 10.9% are against, and 6.0% find it difficult to answer.Compared to September 2025, support for EU membership has increased from 81.7% to 83%. This is the highest figure for the entire monitoring period since 2021. For comparison: in September 2024, 73.7% supported accession, in February-March 2023 – 78.6%, and in September-October 2022 – 78.4% of respondents.The lowest level of support for EU membership was at the beginning of the observation period, in November-December 2021 (55.6% of respondents).<figure class="image"><img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/EU_nato_en1_jpg_92ae9db253.jpeg" alt="EU_nato_en1.jpg.jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_EU_nato_en1_jpg_92ae9db253.jpeg 220w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_EU_nato_en1_jpg_92ae9db253.jpeg 500w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_EU_nato_en1_jpg_92ae9db253.jpeg 750w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_EU_nato_en1_jpg_92ae9db253.jpeg 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000"></figure>NATO membership71.3% of respondents support Ukraine's accession to NATO, 17.9% are against it, and 10.8% find it difficult to answer.Support for NATO membership has grown by 2.8% compared to September 2025, when 68.5% were in favour. At the same time, the figure remains lower than in previous years: in September 2024 – 72.1%, in February-March 2023 – 74.2%.In November-December 2021, 47.8% of respondents were in favour of NATO membership, compared to 33% that were against it.<figure class="image"><img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/EU_nato_en2_jpg_4dba2117bf.jpeg" alt="EU_nato_en2.jpg.jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_EU_nato_en2_jpg_4dba2117bf.jpeg 220w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_EU_nato_en2_jpg_4dba2117bf.jpeg 500w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_EU_nato_en2_jpg_4dba2117bf.jpeg 750w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_EU_nato_en2_jpg_4dba2117bf.jpeg 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000"></figure>NATO's effectivenessMost Ukrainians believe that NATO is capable of effectively defending itself in the event of an attack by Russia. According to the poll, 57.8% of respondents share this opinion, 28.6% disagree, and 13.6% find it difficult to answer.At the same time, opinions are divided on the possibility of Russia attacking one of the NATO countries. 16.1% of respondents believe that Russia “definitely intends to attack,” 52% believe that it “may intend to attack,” 19.6% believe that it “does not intend to attack,” and 12.2% find it “hard to answer.”<figure class="image"><img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/EU_nato_en3_jpg_867c74387f.jpeg" alt="EU_nato_en3.jpg.jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_EU_nato_en3_jpg_867c74387f.jpeg 220w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_EU_nato_en3_jpg_867c74387f.jpeg 500w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_EU_nato_en3_jpg_867c74387f.jpeg 750w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_EU_nato_en3_jpg_867c74387f.jpeg 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000"></figure>The sociological survey was commissioned by the Kyiv Security Forum and conducted by The Razumkov Center on government-controlled Ukrainian territories from January 31-February 04, 2026, using phone interviews. A total of 1,003 respondents aged 18 and older living in all regions of Ukraine (except for the Autonomous Republic of Crimea) were interviewed. The survey was conducted among citizens who were in Ukraine at the time, in areas controlled by the Ukrainian government and covered by Ukrainian telephone operators. The structure of the sample population reflects the demographic structure of the adult population in the territories where the survey was conducted as of the beginning of 2022 (by macro-regions, age, gender, type of settlement). The theoretical sampling error does not exceed 3.2%.

83% of respondents support Ukraine's accession to the EU, while 71.3% support NATO membership. Compared to September 2025, Ukrainian support for both of these strategic issues has grown. These are the findings of the survey commissioned by the Kyiv Security Forum and conducted by The Razumkov Center on the eve of the Munich Security Conference, which will take place on February 13-15.

Support for EU and NATO membership among Ukrainians has grown, according to a survey by the KSF

75.2% of respondents are convinced that if a peace agreement is signed, Russia will violate it and attack Ukraine as soon as it deems necessary.This is the highest figure recorded during the entire observation period. These are the findings of the survey commissioned by the Kyiv Security Forum and conducted by The Razumkov Center on the eve of the Munich Security Conference, which will take place on February 13-15.The survey covers Ukrainians' expectations regarding the end of the war, their trust in the state, other countries and international institutions, as well as the resilience of households in the face of Russian attacks on energy infrastructure.Distrust in peace agreements with Russia is growingRespondents are sceptical about Russia's ability to comply with peace agreements. 75.2% of those surveyed believe that Russia will violate the agreement and attack Ukraine as soon as it deems necessary. 9.9% are convinced that both sides will try to comply with the terms of the peace agreement.<figure class="image"><img alt="ugody_fb_en1.jpg.jpeg" src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/ugody_fb_en1_jpg_6d7489fcb2.jpeg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_ugody_fb_en1_jpg_6d7489fcb2.jpeg 220w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_ugody_fb_en1_jpg_6d7489fcb2.jpeg 500w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_ugody_fb_en1_jpg_6d7489fcb2.jpeg 750w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_ugody_fb_en1_jpg_6d7489fcb2.jpeg 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000"></figure>Compared to prior periods, distrust in potential peace agreements has increased. In April-May 2025, 66.5% of respondents held this view, while in September 2025, the figure was 64.2%. Thus, the indicator has increased by 8.7 percentage points since April-May 2025.<figure class="image"><img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/dyn0226_ENG_10_page_0015_a6e6a1dcff.jpg" alt="dyn0226_ENG (10)_page-0015.jpg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_dyn0226_ENG_10_page_0015_a6e6a1dcff.jpg 219w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_dyn0226_ENG_10_page_0015_a6e6a1dcff.jpg 500w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_dyn0226_ENG_10_page_0015_a6e6a1dcff.jpg 750w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_dyn0226_ENG_10_page_0015_a6e6a1dcff.jpg 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000"></figure>Continuation of Russian aggression after the withdrawal of troops from DonbasMore than two-thirds of Ukrainians (69.6%) are convinced that even if Ukraine withdraws its troops from the entire territory of Donetsk and Luhansk regions, Russia will continue its aggression. The opposite opinion is held by 19.6% of respondents, while 10.8% find it difficult to answer.Minimum conditions for a peace agreementUkrainians' opinions on the minimum conditions necessary for a peace agreement with Russia are divided. However, the majority – 33.2% of respondents – believe that Ukraine must be freed from Russian troops within the 1991 borders, while 25.5% believe it should be within the borders as of 24 February 2022.Only 3.7% of respondents suggest the complete withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, and from the entire territory of these regions within their administrative borders.<figure class="image"><img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/Res0126tel1000_ENG_11_bez_numeracziyi_page_0004_607c3a3742.jpg" alt="Res0126tel1000_ENG_11 (без нумерації)_page-0004.jpg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_Res0126tel1000_ENG_11_bez_numeracziyi_page_0004_607c3a3742.jpg 219w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_Res0126tel1000_ENG_11_bez_numeracziyi_page_0004_607c3a3742.jpg 500w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_Res0126tel1000_ENG_11_bez_numeracziyi_page_0004_607c3a3742.jpg 750w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_Res0126tel1000_ENG_11_bez_numeracziyi_page_0004_607c3a3742.jpg 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000"></figure>Compared to previous periods, the requirements for peace have changed. Support for a return to the 1991 borders has fallen from 51.5% in June 2024 to 33.2% in February 2026.At the same time, the proportion of those who suggest fixing the borders along the front line has increased from 9.4% in June 2024 to 23.5% in February 2026.<figure class="image"><img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/dyn0226_ENG_10_page_0014_68897d4141.jpg" alt="dyn0226_ENG (10)_page-0014.jpg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_dyn0226_ENG_10_page_0014_68897d4141.jpg 219w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_dyn0226_ENG_10_page_0014_68897d4141.jpg 500w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_dyn0226_ENG_10_page_0014_68897d4141.jpg 750w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_dyn0226_ENG_10_page_0014_68897d4141.jpg 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000"></figure>Aspects of a peace agreementRespondents are categorically unwilling to compromise on key aspects of a possible peace agreement. 73.1% believe that Ukraine's real security guarantees cannot be compromised, 73.3% – assistance in Ukraine's economic recovery, 72% – Russia's responsibility for war crimes, 69.3% – the collection of reparations from Russia in favour of Ukraine.Regarding territorial issues, 62.7% are convinced that Ukraine's control over Donbas cannot be compromised.Opinions on Euro-Atlantic integration are almost evenly divided. 47.9% believe that Ukraine's course towards EU membership cannot be compromised, while 40.2% are open to such a compromise. Regarding NATO: 48.6% are not ready to compromise on this course, while 38.3% are willing to consider such an option.<img src="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/Res0126tel1000_ENG_11_bez_numeracziyi_page_0005_b9b4fc17ca.jpg" alt="Res0126tel1000_ENG_11 (без нумерації)_page-0005.jpg" srcset="https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/thumbnail_Res0126tel1000_ENG_11_bez_numeracziyi_page_0005_b9b4fc17ca.jpg 219w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/small_Res0126tel1000_ENG_11_bez_numeracziyi_page_0005_b9b4fc17ca.jpg 500w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/medium_Res0126tel1000_ENG_11_bez_numeracziyi_page_0005_b9b4fc17ca.jpg 750w, https://ksf-openukraine.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/large_Res0126tel1000_ENG_11_bez_numeracziyi_page_0005_b9b4fc17ca.jpg 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000"> The sociological survey was commissioned by the Kyiv Security Forum and conducted by The Razumkov Center on government-controlled Ukrainian territories from January 31-February 04, 2026, using phone interviews. A total of 1,003 respondents aged 18 and older living in all regions of Ukraine (except for the Autonomous Republic of Crimea) were interviewed. The survey was conducted among citizens who were in Ukraine at the time, in areas controlled by the Ukrainian government and covered by Ukrainian telephone operators. The structure of the sample population reflects the demographic structure of the adult population in the territories where the survey was conducted as of the beginning of 2022 (by macro-regions, age, gender, type of settlement). The theoretical sampling error does not exceed 3.2%.

75.2% of respondents are convinced that if a peace agreement is signed, Russia will violate it and attack Ukraine as soon as it deems necessary.This is the highest figure recorded during the entire observation period. These are the findings of the survey commissioned by the Kyiv Security Forum and conducted by The Razumkov Center on the eve of the Munich Security Conference, which will take place on February 13-15.